Friday, April 18, 2025

Why would nasally-transferred coronavirus solely have an effect on the left facet of the mind?


WE GET QUESTIONS!

Q – “I survived a light case of COVID. Ought to I be nervous concerning the quantity of grey matter in olfactory-related constructions within the left hemisphere of my mind?”

A – Most of what you’ve got learn on social media could also be overstated.

One of many scariest issues about SARS-CoV-2 (aside from doable demise) is that it impacts a number of organs, together with the mind. The overwhelming majority of research have in contrast measures in COVID survivors to these obtained from contributors with out COVID. These cross-sectional research can’t decide whether or not pre-existing variations can account for disease-related ‘modifications’.

An essential new preprint by Douaud and colleagues reported outcomes from a longitudinal examine that obtained MRIs from contributors earlier than and throughout the pandemic. Fastidiously matched cohorts of COVID+ (n=394) and COVID- (n=388) folks got a second scan 3 years after their preliminary entry into the examine. Nearly all of sufferers weren’t hospitalized. The authors hypothesized that mind areas associated to odor and style, senses which present notable decrements in contaminated sufferers, could be altered within the COVID-19 inhabitants.

 

from Vaughan & Jackson (2014). The “piriform axis” is an uncommon indirect angle that exhibits main olfactory cortex (Pir, piriform cortex) within the orbitofrontal area of the frontal lobe and close by medial temporal lobe constructions associated to emotion and reminiscence (Am, amygdala and Hip, hippocampus).

The scary entrée of the virus into the mind could also be by way of the nostril. In mice, the S1 subunit of the coronavirus spike protein crosses the protecting blood mind barrier and leads to the olfactory bulb inside 10-30 min (Rhea et al., 2021). After that, we do not actually know what occurs. So it is a stretch to recommend that neurotropism (viral an infection of mind cells) causes alterations at a macro degree in people that may be detected by structural MRI. Anyway, that is the speculation.

What was unclear to me, nevertheless, was the variety of different analyses carried out as a part of the examine. Aside from the odor/style areas of curiosity (ROIs), there have been 2,360 distinct measures of mind construction or operate (together with resting-state fMRI and task-related fMRI, which we assume weren’t considerably totally different within the sufferers).

Sticking to the ROIs, the authors ran permutation checks that corrected for a number of comparisons and located that solely the left hemisphere was affected. WHY?? Regardless of the Proustian hypothesis…

“…the place the left hemisphere appear [sic] to be extra concerned within the emotional facet of olfactory reminiscence (the well-known madeleine de Proust affiliation that appeared significantly focused in COVID-19).”

…it is mysterious why the virus would have deleterious results on the mind by solely invading the left nostril.

 

Fig. 1. (Douaud et al., 2021). The three most important areas exhibiting vital loss of gray matter (thickness, quantity) between the two time-points particularly for the COVID sufferers are the parahippocampal gyrus, the lateral orbitofrontal cortex, and the superior insula. All outcomes had been localised to the left hemisphere.

The opposite notable facet of the outcomes was the large overlap in distribution between the COVID+ and COVID- contributors (see snarky commentary within the first determine). The authors helpfully confirmed the total unfold of values for the time 1 vs. time 2 distinction (clustered round zero). However did grey matter quantity and thickness really improve in some folks? Though the group variations had been statistically vital, had been there any practical penalties? Severity of odor/style loss? Results on reminiscence or emotion? We do not know.

COVID-19 can have persistent, disabling results in some folks, together with younger and beforehand wholesome people (the “lengthy haulers”, see Davis et al., 2021). There isn’t any doubt concerning the actuality of Lengthy Covid.

However, alarmist protection of preliminary neuroimaging findings isn’t useful. The variations in Fig. 1 of Douaud et al. don’t depict a shrinkage of 4 customary deviations, regardless of what some broadly circulated tweets could declare. As one of many authors explains:

 

In reality, the exploratory evaluation confirmed the biggest lack of mind quantity was non-specific (and never mentioned). And maybe not on account of neurotropic invasion?

 

Longitudinal research are extraordinarily beneficial, and the authors are to be recommended for this. We’ll look forward to future papers to confirm these findings, however for now I am not completely satisfied.

References

Davis HE, Assaf GS, McCorkell L, Wei H, Low
RJ, Re’em Y, Redfield S, Austin JP, Akrami A. (2021). Characterizing lengthy COVID in a world cohort: 7 months of signs and their affect.
EClinicalMedicine. 2021 Jul 15. Epub forward of print. PMID: 34308300.

 

Douaud G, Lee S, Alfaro-Almagro F, Arthofer C, Wang C, Lange F, Andersson JL, Griffanti L, Duff E, Jbabdi S, Taschler B. (preprint). Mind imaging earlier than and after COVID-19 in UK Biobank. medRxiv. June 20, 2021.
Rhea EM, Logsdon AF, Hansen KM, Williams LM, Reed MJ, Baumann KK, Holden SJ, Raber J, Banks WA, Erickson MA. (2021). The S1 protein of SARS-CoV-2 crosses the blood–mind barrier in mice. Nature Neuroscience 24(3):368-78.



Related Articles

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest Articles